#195 Georgia Tech-B (2-9)

avg: 156.73  •  sd: 140.84  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
136 Alabama Loss 2-6 122.36 Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
77 Tennessee-Chattanooga** Loss 0-11 579.39 Ignored Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
56 Tennessee** Loss 2-11 740.42 Ignored Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
114 Union (Tennessee)** Loss 0-10 299.39 Ignored Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
206 Vanderbilt Loss 6-7 -103.28 Feb 12th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
179 LSU Loss 3-6 -199.1 Feb 12th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
38 Chicago** Loss 2-13 967.22 Ignored Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
46 Florida State** Loss 3-10 873.72 Ignored Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
193 Minnesota-Duluth Win 6-3 742.5 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
214 Notre Dame-B Win 11-1 395.29 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
166 Tulane Loss 3-8 -150.18 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)