#40 Georgia (6-7)

avg: 1530.7  •  sd: 99.78  •  top 16/20: 0.9%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
35 Michigan Loss 6-9 1201.01 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
45 Washington University Loss 9-11 1230.06 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
4 Tufts** Loss 5-15 1826.44 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
202 North Carolina-Wilmington** Win 14-4 645.79 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
62 William & Mary Win 9-4 1877.48 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
60 Ohio Win 9-4 1899.34 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
19 Yale Loss 7-13 1228.53 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
13 Pittsburgh Loss 7-12 1412.83 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
35 Michigan Win 12-9 1964.94 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
36 Brown Win 9-8 1705.07 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
44 Pennsylvania Loss 8-9 1359.31 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
26 Notre Dame Loss 10-11 1563.33 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
71 Massachusetts Win 11-9 1482.69 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)