#308 Mississippi State-B (5-12)

avg: 337.25  •  sd: 52.38  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
110 Berry** Loss 2-13 607.55 Ignored Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
90 Missouri S&T** Loss 2-13 695.31 Ignored Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
282 Tennessee Tech Loss 9-10 324.75 Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
127 Clemson** Loss 2-13 534.14 Ignored Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
268 Harding Loss 5-15 -64.04 Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
158 Vanderbilt** Loss 3-9 402.81 Ignored Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
311 Mississippi Win 9-8 436.08 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
289 Texas-San Antonio Loss 8-10 152.39 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
325 Sam Houston Win 8-7 380.18 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
361 LSU-B Win 9-6 405.24 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
313 Alabama-B Loss 10-13 -26.78 Mar 22nd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
172 Alabama-Birmingham Loss 6-13 350.21 Mar 22nd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
311 Mississippi Win 13-10 639.22 Mar 22nd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
185 Union (Tennessee) Loss 4-13 278.92 Mar 22nd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
172 Alabama-Birmingham Loss 10-15 496.6 Mar 23rd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
302 Samford Win 11-9 621.82 Mar 23rd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
185 Union (Tennessee) Loss 4-11 278.92 Mar 23rd 2025 Annual Magic City Invite
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)