#52 Whitman (17-1)

avg: 1756.72  •  sd: 60.86  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
291 Pacific Lutheran** Win 13-2 1348.55 Ignored Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
81 Lewis & Clark Loss 8-12 1146.32 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
276 Whitworth** Win 13-3 1446.13 Ignored Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
173 Xavier Win 13-4 1833.43 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
235 Claremont** Win 13-3 1595.21 Ignored Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
178 Portland Win 12-7 1729.28 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
239 Reed** Win 13-4 1589.35 Ignored Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
88 Berry Win 13-11 1780.52 Mar 2nd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
209 Christopher Newport Win 13-6 1681.48 Mar 2nd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
114 Davidson Win 13-6 2037.27 Mar 2nd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
176 Navy Win 13-4 1812.43 Mar 2nd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
232 Butler** Win 13-0 1610.21 Ignored Mar 3rd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
168 Kenyon Win 13-7 1809.89 Mar 3rd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
65 Richmond Win 13-11 1903.83 Mar 3rd FCS D III Tune Up 2024
291 Pacific Lutheran** Win 15-2 1348.55 Ignored Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
178 Portland Win 15-6 1808.77 Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
276 Whitworth Win 15-8 1410.94 Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
81 Lewis & Clark Win 15-10 2041.08 Apr 14th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)