#384 Carthage (1-9)

avg: -310.44  •  sd: 149.26  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
354 Illinois-Chicago Loss 7-10 -327.98 Mar 22nd Meltdown 2025
82 St Olaf** Loss 0-13 721 Ignored Mar 22nd Meltdown 2025
145 Kenyon** Loss 3-13 459.11 Ignored Mar 22nd Meltdown 2025
293 Minnesota State-Mankato Loss 10-11 275.87 Mar 22nd Meltdown 2025
355 Rose-Hulman Loss 2-9 -546.82 Mar 23rd Meltdown 2025
295 Loyola-Chicago** Loss 1-10 -201.46 Ignored Mar 23rd Meltdown 2025
394 Iowa State-B Win 13-5 -306.78 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
281 Wisconsin-Platteville** Loss 3-13 -149.13 Ignored Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
331 Minnesota-C Loss 4-13 -368.4 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
369 Iowa-B Loss 4-9 -671.74 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)