#278 Central Connecticut State (6-6)

avg: 469.54  •  sd: 66.8  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
254 Swarthmore Win 9-7 866.6 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
299 Massachusetts-Lowell Loss 6-7 260.01 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
321 Pennsylvania Western Win 8-7 397.07 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
231 Salisbury Loss 7-8 559.63 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
330 Cornell-B Loss 8-10 -30.08 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
362 Stevens Tech Win 8-2 583.55 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
383 Boston University-B Win 8-4 257.72 Mar 29th Ocean State Invite 2025
152 Tufts-B Loss 2-13 446.42 Mar 29th Ocean State Invite 2025
237 Connecticut College Win 6-5 774.5 Mar 29th Ocean State Invite 2025
358 Providence Win 11-4 615.58 Mar 29th Ocean State Invite 2025
126 Maine** Loss 1-15 538.09 Ignored Mar 30th Ocean State Invite 2025
152 Tufts-B Loss 4-15 446.42 Mar 30th Ocean State Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)