#253 Rice (5-5)

avg: 929.6  •  sd: 101.37  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
366 Dallas Win 15-1 1025.22 Feb 10th Big D in Little D 2024
258 North Texas Win 11-9 1166.32 Feb 10th Big D in Little D 2024
233 Oklahoma Loss 10-11 880.7 Feb 10th Big D in Little D 2024
258 North Texas Loss 5-9 388.05 Mar 9th Centex Tier 2 2024
109 Tarleton State Loss 5-13 867.61 Mar 9th Centex Tier 2 2024
281 Trinity Win 15-6 1427.06 Mar 10th Centex Tier 2 2024
190 Texas-Dallas Win 15-13 1372.52 Mar 10th Centex Tier 2 2024
207 Texas-B Loss 8-15 523.88 Mar 10th Centex Tier 2 2024
366 Dallas Win 13-7 982.75 Apr 13th Texas D III Mens Conferences 2024
281 Trinity Loss 9-10 702.06 Apr 13th Texas D III Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)