#117 Swarthmore (8-5)

avg: 1195.07  •  sd: 72.27  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
213 Dickinson** Win 9-2 1076.19 Ignored Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
113 George Washington Loss 4-8 647.17 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
185 Skidmore Win 9-2 1289.71 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
160 Syracuse Win 8-6 1174 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
102 Lehigh Loss 7-8 1151.26 Feb 23rd Bring The Huckus 2025
185 Skidmore Win 10-4 1289.71 Feb 23rd Bring The Huckus 2025
160 Syracuse Win 8-7 998.51 Feb 23rd Bring The Huckus 2025
145 Boston College Loss 7-8 861.95 Mar 22nd Jersey Devil 2025
58 Brown Loss 4-13 1067.49 Mar 22nd Jersey Devil 2025
144 RIT Win 11-7 1465.47 Mar 22nd Jersey Devil 2025
95 Williams Win 8-6 1639.11 Mar 22nd Jersey Devil 2025
145 Boston College Win 9-5 1516.01 Mar 23rd Jersey Devil 2025
95 Williams Loss 10-12 1100.5 Mar 23rd Jersey Devil 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)