#387 Wisconsin-Milwaukee-B (2-9)

avg: -406.97  •  sd: 75.83  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
355 Rose-Hulman Loss 6-14 -546.82 Mar 15th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
285 Luther** Loss 3-15 -167.57 Ignored Mar 15th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
220 Winona State** Loss 0-15 114.32 Ignored Mar 15th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
288 Michigan State-B Loss 7-15 -178.95 Mar 16th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
389 Wisconsin-C Win 8-4 -35.31 Mar 16th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
389 Wisconsin-C Loss 5-6 -725.12 Mar 16th Grand Rapids Invite 2025
369 Iowa-B Loss 8-13 -567.9 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
312 St Thomas** Loss 5-13 -294.15 Ignored Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
309 Washington University-B** Loss 5-12 -282.02 Ignored Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
394 Iowa State-B Win 13-8 -410.62 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
331 Minnesota-C** Loss 5-13 -368.4 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)