#309 Washington University-B (4-14)

avg: 317.98  •  sd: 64.83  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
169 Kansas Loss 6-13 360.46 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
323 Kansas State Win 12-7 790.05 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
201 Northern Iowa Loss 7-13 253.59 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
239 Texas-Dallas Loss 9-10 521.77 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
287 Oklahoma Loss 7-8 298.99 Feb 23rd Dust Bowl 2025
256 Illinois-B Loss 7-12 60.02 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
77 Iowa State** Loss 2-13 750.03 Ignored Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
154 Macalester Loss 6-13 442.94 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
250 Illinois State Loss 8-12 171.43 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
178 Minnesota-B** Loss 4-13 320.73 Ignored Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
82 St Olaf** Loss 2-13 721 Ignored Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
221 Wisconsin-B Loss 6-9 292.14 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
312 St Thomas Loss 10-11 180.85 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
387 Wisconsin-Milwaukee-B** Win 12-5 193.03 Ignored Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
285 Luther Loss 6-10 -63.73 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
394 Iowa State-B** Win 11-1 -306.78 Ignored Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
331 Minnesota-C Win 12-9 576.96 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
285 Luther Loss 6-7 307.43 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)