#341 Portland State (1-11)

avg: 147.16  •  sd: 132.01  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
175 Cal Poly-Humboldt Loss 7-15 336.36 Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
193 Oregon -B** Loss 2-15 252.83 Ignored Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
189 Oregon State-B** Loss 2-15 263.35 Ignored Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
5 Oregon** Loss 1-15 1593.64 Ignored Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
189 Oregon State-B** Loss 4-15 263.35 Ignored Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
121 Simon Fraser** Loss 4-15 570.02 Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
273 Pacific Lutheran Loss 8-13 -10.24 Mar 1st PLU BBQ men
233 Portland Loss 6-13 65.63 Mar 1st PLU BBQ men
242 Reed Loss 4-13 40.47 Mar 1st PLU BBQ men
273 Pacific Lutheran Loss 9-15 -29.56 Mar 2nd PLU BBQ men
297 Willamette Loss 9-13 -23.36 Mar 2nd PLU BBQ men
322 Washington State Win 9-8 394.92 Mar 2nd PLU BBQ men
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)