#193 Oregon -B (4-6)

avg: 852.83  •  sd: 63.41  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
175 Cal Poly-Humboldt Loss 11-12 811.36 Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
341 Portland State** Win 15-2 747.16 Ignored Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
189 Oregon State-B Loss 12-13 738.35 Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
10 Oregon State** Loss 4-15 1381.68 Ignored Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
189 Oregon State-B Win 11-10 988.35 Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
121 Simon Fraser Loss 9-14 696.15 Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
109 Gonzaga Loss 11-13 988.82 Mar 1st PLU BBQ men
189 Oregon State-B Loss 12-13 738.35 Mar 1st PLU BBQ men
228 Seattle Win 15-14 819.62 Mar 2nd PLU BBQ men
274 Whitworth Win 15-9 997.21 Mar 2nd PLU BBQ men
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)