#178 Minnesota-B (6-11)

avg: 920.73  •  sd: 44.61  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
54 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 6-12 958.75 Feb 8th Gopher Dome 2025
82 St Olaf Loss 5-13 721 Feb 8th Gopher Dome 2025
161 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 8-9 859.17 Feb 8th Gopher Dome 2025
154 Macalester Loss 7-9 763.6 Feb 8th Gopher Dome 2025
331 Minnesota-C** Win 13-3 831.6 Ignored Feb 12th Gopher Dome 2025
337 Purdue-B** Win 13-2 785.29 Ignored Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
100 Missouri Loss 7-12 744.84 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
265 St John's (Minnesota) Win 11-7 1019.89 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
107 Iowa Loss 8-10 959.69 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
309 Washington University-B** Win 13-4 917.98 Ignored Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
161 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 10-11 859.17 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
117 Colorado Mines Loss 11-12 1064.25 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
250 Illinois State Win 13-7 1170.12 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
220 Winona State Win 13-3 1314.32 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
123 Wisconsin-Milwaukee Loss 11-12 1021.99 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
201 Northern Iowa Loss 9-11 561.92 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
161 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 6-8 683.68 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)