#131 Harvard (6-8)

avg: 1076.14  •  sd: 63.86  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
70 Connecticut Loss 3-15 968.1 Feb 22nd 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2
32 Georgetown** Loss 5-15 1407.01 Ignored Feb 22nd 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2
112 West Chester Loss 6-9 795.1 Feb 22nd 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2
145 Boston College Loss 9-11 737.74 Feb 23rd 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2
80 Carnegie Mellon Win 8-7 1600.55 Feb 23rd 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2
71 Central Florida Loss 1-15 957.32 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
223 Minnesota-Duluth Win 8-4 930.63 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
146 Tulane Loss 7-8 855.17 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
159 Bowdoin Win 8-7 1003.12 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
188 Brandeis Win 11-3 1264.16 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
53 McGill** Loss 4-12 1136.71 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
179 Bates Win 10-5 1328.44 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
139 Rutgers Win 7-6 1144.06 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
53 McGill Loss 6-11 1190.01 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)