#196 Charleston (8-12)

avg: 1133.53  •  sd: 85.25  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
418 Wisconsin-Eau Claire-B** Win 13-2 600 Ignored Mar 16th Southerns 2024
224 Georgia-B Win 10-8 1302.03 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
215 East Carolina Loss 3-8 465.59 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
248 Florida-B Loss 8-9 838.86 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
248 Florida-B Win 15-3 1563.86 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
94 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 2-15 934.71 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
261 Georgia Tech-B Win 13-12 1029.28 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
215 East Carolina Loss 2-9 465.59 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
179 North Carolina-Asheville Win 11-6 1746.22 Mar 23rd Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
241 Wake Forest Loss 5-6 861.99 Mar 23rd Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
98 Georgia State Loss 5-9 991.76 Mar 24th Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
114 Davidson Loss 3-11 837.27 Mar 24th Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
164 Kennesaw State Loss 7-10 879.46 Mar 24th Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
214 North Carolina-B Win 11-6 1620.49 Mar 24th Needle in a Ho Stack 2024
72 Appalachian State Loss 7-10 1238.99 Apr 13th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
14 North Carolina State** Loss 3-15 1571.47 Ignored Apr 13th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
42 South Carolina** Loss 0-15 1246.77 Ignored Apr 13th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
241 Wake Forest Win 14-7 1569.87 Apr 13th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
146 Clemson Loss 9-12 972.99 Apr 14th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
215 East Carolina Win 11-8 1431.2 Apr 14th Carolina D I Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)