#19 Mephisto (8-4)

avg: 2065.72  •  sd: 66.46  •  top 16/20: 31.2%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
41 Garden State Ultimate Win 12-10 1895.09 Jun 21st Philly Invite 2025
29 Shade Win 13-11 2092.76 Jun 21st Philly Invite 2025
33 Oak Grove Boys Win 13-11 2011.16 Jun 21st Philly Invite 2025
7 Philadelphia Pacmen Win 13-12 2473.07 Jun 21st Philly Invite 2025
20 Blueprint Loss 10-13 1721.79 Jun 22nd Philly Invite 2025
33 Oak Grove Boys Win 13-9 2200.88 Jun 22nd Philly Invite 2025
22 Dark Star Loss 12-14 1797.63 Jul 12th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
12 Furious George Win 12-11 2279.64 Jul 12th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
27 Doublewide Loss 13-14 1764.68 Jul 13th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
38 Haymaker Win 15-9 2214.62 Jul 13th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
45 Switchback Win 14-8 2067.18 Jul 13th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
5 SoCal Condors Loss 11-12 2270.2 Jul 13th 2025 Pro Elite Challenge West
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)