#124 Jacksonville State (9-8)

avg: 885.74  •  sd: 49.04  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
172 Florida State Loss 9-10 474.77 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
135 Trinity Loss 8-9 677.96 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
71 Union (Tennessee) Loss 2-12 670.35 Feb 22nd Mardi Gras XXXVII
65 Florida Loss 4-12 719.34 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
177 Tulane Win 9-8 697.18 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
51 Middlebury Loss 5-7 1153.54 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
233 Auburn** Win 13-2 724.76 Ignored Apr 12th Gulf Coast D I Womens Conferences 2025
189 LSU Win 9-6 908.86 Apr 12th Gulf Coast D I Womens Conferences 2025
209 Vanderbilt** Win 12-3 880.82 Ignored Apr 12th Gulf Coast D I Womens Conferences 2025
177 Tulane Win 11-3 1172.18 Apr 13th Gulf Coast D I Womens Conferences 2025
189 LSU Win 15-6 1090.29 Apr 13th Gulf Coast D I Womens Conferences 2025
156 Georgia Southern Win 14-11 986.94 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
33 Georgia Tech** Loss 1-15 1051.61 Ignored Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
212 Georgia-B Win 14-8 808.65 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
189 LSU Win 12-4 1090.29 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
99 Emory Loss 7-9 796 Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
29 Georgia** Loss 4-15 1126.12 Ignored Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)