#184 Skidmore (10-12)

avg: 521.4  •  sd: 66.86  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
223 Dickinson Loss 4-6 -160.46 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
138 George Washington Loss 4-8 226.49 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
118 Swarthmore Loss 2-9 339.23 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
160 Syracuse Loss 0-10 63.44 Feb 22nd Bring The Huckus 2025
223 Dickinson Win 8-4 769.96 Feb 23rd Bring The Huckus 2025
118 Swarthmore Loss 4-10 339.23 Feb 23rd Bring The Huckus 2025
224 SUNY-Cortland Win 8-6 503.74 Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
162 SUNY-Geneseo Loss 5-6 521.31 Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
160 Syracuse Win 8-7 788.44 Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
204 Vassar Win 7-5 716.1 Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
148 Dartmouth Loss 6-10 212.27 Mar 30th Northeast Classic 2025
112 SUNY-Binghamton Loss 4-9 370.18 Mar 30th Northeast Classic 2025
239 Connecticut College Win 8-7 200.32 Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D III Womens Conferences 2025
217 Rensselaer Polytech Win 10-5 826.9 Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D III Womens Conferences 2025
204 Vassar Win 10-2 987.96 Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D III Womens Conferences 2025
39 Wesleyan** Loss 1-13 987.33 Ignored Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D III Womens Conferences 2025
153 Hamilton Win 5-4 806.19 Apr 26th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
56 Rochester** Loss 3-15 821.74 Ignored Apr 26th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
162 SUNY-Geneseo Loss 6-8 345.82 Apr 26th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
204 Vassar Win 6-5 512.96 Apr 26th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
153 Hamilton Win 8-6 981.68 Apr 27th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
94 Ithaca Loss 2-8 494.08 Apr 27th Metro East D III College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)