#39 Zephyr (3-7)

avg: 882.56  •  sd: 86.89  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
34 Brooklyn Book Club Loss 8-9 921.02 Jun 21st Zephyr Round Robin
60 Pine Baroness Win 9-6 831.73 Jun 21st Zephyr Round Robin
45 Pizza Rat Win 10-9 871.26 Jun 21st Zephyr Round Robin
44 Wave Loss 7-8 624.67 Jun 21st Zephyr Round Robin
1 BENT** Loss 5-13 1628.52 Ignored Jul 12th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
29 Wicked Loss 10-14 746.45 Jul 12th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
31 Agency Loss 6-8 814.05 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
34 Brooklyn Book Club Loss 5-6 921.02 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
50 CHAOS Win 7-4 1146.22 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
27 San Antonio Problems Loss 7-8 1082.27 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)