#162 Pennsylvania (3-8)

avg: 282.37  •  sd: 98.4  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
142 Christopher Newport Loss 8-13 -14.49 Jan 25th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
187 Navy Win 13-4 382.02 Jan 25th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
95 Vermont-B Loss 7-12 399.91 Jan 25th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
37 William & Mary** Loss 3-13 817.78 Ignored Jan 25th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
123 Boston University Loss 4-15 68.35 Jan 26th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
153 East Carolina Win 13-8 887.77 Jan 26th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
138 Johns Hopkins Loss 4-11 -57.33 Jan 26th Mid Atlantic Warm Up 2025
141 Connecticut Loss 8-9 373.9 Feb 8th NJ Warmup 2025
161 Lehigh Loss 12-13 178.74 Feb 8th NJ Warmup 2025
180 NYU Win 13-4 627.03 Feb 8th NJ Warmup 2025
174 Syracuse Loss 11-12 -45.25 Feb 8th NJ Warmup 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)