#338 Penn State-Behrend (3-5)

avg: 548.76  •  sd: 72.43  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
417 Denison** Win 13-1 182.85 Ignored Mar 1st Huckin in the Hills XI
266 Drexel Loss 3-8 205.3 Mar 1st Huckin in the Hills XI
179 Ohio Loss 6-13 551.21 Mar 1st Huckin in the Hills XI
307 Cleveland State Loss 6-8 353.43 Mar 2nd Huckin in the Hills XI
397 Ohio-B Win 13-1 694.65 Mar 2nd Huckin in the Hills XI
396 Maryland-B Win 11-7 574.56 Mar 2nd Huckin in the Hills XI
178 Dickinson Loss 10-15 699.2 Apr 12th West Penn D III Mens Conferences 2025
170 Messiah Loss 7-15 583.27 Apr 12th West Penn D III Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)