#250 Worcester Polytechnic (10-12)

avg: 867.13  •  sd: 64.37  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
90 Bowdoin** Loss 3-15 878.93 Ignored Mar 22nd PBR State Open
159 Brandeis Loss 2-15 617.2 Mar 22nd PBR State Open
222 MIT Loss 7-13 418.6 Mar 22nd PBR State Open
123 Bates Loss 4-13 744.49 Mar 23rd PBR State Open
310 Bentley Win 12-4 1236.01 Mar 23rd PBR State Open
116 Boston University Loss 6-15 763.62 Mar 23rd PBR State Open
293 Amherst Win 9-8 846.01 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
159 Brandeis Loss 5-13 617.2 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
370 Wentworth Win 13-4 909.43 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
350 Western New England Win 9-8 570.55 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
90 Bowdoin** Loss 6-15 878.93 Ignored Mar 30th New England Open 2025
351 Clark Loss 9-11 172.49 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
185 Northeastern-B Loss 6-15 516.27 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
284 Northeastern-C Win 14-5 1357.13 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
275 Bryant Win 13-4 1376.95 Apr 19th South New England D III Mens Conferences 2025
344 Holy Cross Win 13-2 1098.32 Apr 19th South New England D III Mens Conferences 2025
282 Roger Williams Win 11-10 886.48 Apr 19th South New England D III Mens Conferences 2025
80 Williams** Loss 6-15 939.38 Ignored Apr 20th South New England D III Mens Conferences 2025
282 Roger Williams Win 13-6 1361.48 May 3rd New England D III College Mens Regionals 2025
80 Williams Loss 7-13 981.85 May 3rd New England D III College Mens Regionals 2025
293 Amherst Win 15-14 846.01 May 4th New England D III College Mens Regionals 2025
231 Colby Loss 11-12 802.19 May 4th New England D III College Mens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)