#246 Notre Dame-B (2-15)

avg: 20.99  •  sd: 119.16  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
122 Cincinnati** Loss 1-12 311.56 Ignored Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
144 Knox** Loss 3-8 125.69 Ignored Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
200 Truman State Win 6-5 558.99 Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
254 Purdue-B Loss 5-7 -442.16 Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
221 North Park Loss 6-7 83.2 Mar 30th Corny Classic College 2025
215 Washington University-B Loss 3-4 137.07 Mar 30th Corny Classic College 2025
197 Indiana Loss 1-11 -145.41 Apr 12th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
11 Michigan** Loss 1-13 1513.92 Ignored Apr 12th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
72 Purdue** Loss 0-13 660.94 Ignored Apr 12th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
131 Grand Valley** Loss 1-13 214.79 Ignored Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
180 Michigan-B Loss 2-13 -57.33 Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
254 Purdue-B Win 4-1 485.98 Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2025
180 Michigan-B Loss 4-10 -57.33 Apr 26th Great Lakes D I Womens Regionals 2025
117 Northwestern** Loss 0-13 339.88 Ignored Apr 26th Great Lakes D I Womens Regionals 2025
72 Purdue** Loss 0-13 660.94 Ignored Apr 26th Great Lakes D I Womens Regionals 2025
131 Grand Valley** Loss 0-15 214.79 Ignored Apr 27th Great Lakes D I Womens Regionals 2025
180 Michigan-B Loss 0-15 -57.33 Apr 27th Great Lakes D I Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)