#139 Arizona (6-12)

avg: 759.35  •  sd: 59.79  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
94 Arizona State Loss 8-13 639.42 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
145 Colorado-B Win 8-6 1005.83 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
78 Grand Canyon Loss 5-10 718.88 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
77 Denver Loss 8-11 935.52 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
180 Arizona-B Win 11-5 860.45 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
94 Arizona State Loss 5-8 681.98 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
176 Cal State-Long Beach Win 8-4 890.08 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
83 California-San Diego-B Loss 7-8 1106.17 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
162 UCLA-B Win 7-4 1030.46 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
23 UCLA** Loss 2-12 1359.3 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
37 California** Loss 3-11 1152.36 Ignored Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
83 California-San Diego-B Loss 4-9 631.17 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
204 Colorado College-B** Win 15-6 600 Ignored Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
52 Colorado College** Loss 5-15 1001.63 Ignored Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
77 Denver Loss 3-15 701.13 Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
157 Colorado Mines Loss 11-13 372.3 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
145 Colorado-B Win 9-8 830.34 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
94 Arizona State Loss 3-15 535.58 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)