#77 Cowtown Cannons (8-5)

avg: 1143.13  •  sd: 87.96  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
127 NOx Win 10-5 1315.33 Jun 14th Texas 2 FingerOpen
51 Alamode Loss 7-13 926.77 Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
160 Forge** Win 13-4 1026.97 Ignored Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
111 El Niño Win 12-10 1090.68 Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
93 Brawl Loss 11-14 717.94 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
74 H.I.P Win 15-9 1701.8 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
95 Sprawl Loss 11-12 892.12 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
173 Dallas Delinquents** Win 13-2 812.19 Ignored Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
151 Heatwave Win 13-6 1132.35 Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
81 Gamble Loss 11-13 898.4 Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
154 Bonzaiiiii!!** Win 15-5 1109.26 Ignored Jul 13th Riverside Classic 2025
93 Brawl Win 15-7 1631.28 Jul 13th Riverside Classic 2025
81 Gamble Loss 3-3 1127.24 Jul 13th Riverside Classic 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)