#160 Forge (4-8)

avg: 426.97  •  sd: 70.36  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
51 Alamode** Loss 4-13 884.3 Ignored Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
77 Cowtown Cannons** Loss 4-13 543.13 Ignored Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
111 El Niño Loss 8-12 411.4 Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
125 Riverside Loss 9-15 255.58 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
182 Vintage Velocity Win 15-3 667.23 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
175 Supercell Win 15-8 749.26 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
154 Bonzaiiiii!! Loss 11-12 384.26 Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
93 Brawl** Loss 3-10 431.28 Ignored Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
125 Riverside Loss 8-13 274.91 Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
155 Texas United Loss 6-10 6.2 Jul 12th Riverside Classic 2025
184 A La Carte [B] Win 14-11 296.24 Jul 13th Riverside Classic 2025
174 San Antonio Warhawks Win 15-4 801.03 Jul 13th Riverside Classic 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)