#51 Alamode (8-4)

avg: 1484.3  •  sd: 59.5  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
111 El Niño Win 13-7 1410.08 Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
160 Forge** Win 13-4 1026.97 Ignored Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
77 Cowtown Cannons Win 13-7 1700.67 Jun 28th Texas 2 FingerOpen
139 Texas Duffy Win 15-10 1061.91 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
93 Brawl Win 15-7 1631.28 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
95 Sprawl Win 15-5 1617.12 Jun 29th Texas 2 FingerOpen
48 Fungi Win 12-11 1627.56 Jul 12th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
33 Oak Grove Boys Loss 9-11 1533.11 Jul 12th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
35 Alliance Loss 9-13 1345.1 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
39 ELDL Loss 9-11 1412.85 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
68 Drought Win 10-8 1503.87 Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
15 GOAT** Loss 4-13 1513.99 Ignored Jul 13th 2025 Select Flight Invite East
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)