#374 Harvard-B (4-17)

avg: 287.2  •  sd: 66.04  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
229 Harvard** Loss 2-13 339.03 Ignored Mar 9th MIT Invite
222 MIT** Loss 1-13 376.13 Ignored Mar 9th MIT Invite
284 Northeastern-C Loss 5-7 428.99 Mar 9th MIT Invite
361 MIT-B Win 8-6 685.52 Mar 9th MIT Invite
335 Florida-B Loss 4-6 192.95 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
280 Jacksonville State Loss 2-11 166.09 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
373 Nova Southeastern Loss 8-9 169.19 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
398 South Florida-B Win 7-6 219.17 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
90 Bowdoin** Loss 2-13 878.93 Ignored Mar 29th New England Open 2025
284 Northeastern-C Loss 8-10 494.47 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
185 Northeastern-B** Loss 2-13 516.27 Ignored Mar 29th New England Open 2025
316 Massachusetts-Lowell Loss 4-8 54.69 Mar 29th New England Open 2025
329 Connecticut-B Loss 3-9 -25 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
370 Wentworth Loss 10-12 71.31 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
350 Western New England Win 7-0 1045.55 Mar 30th New England Open 2025
411 Boston University-B Win 11-6 344.56 Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
253 Brown-B Loss 4-11 257.11 Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
185 Northeastern-B** Loss 1-15 516.27 Ignored Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
91 Vermont-B** Loss 2-15 878.29 Ignored Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
201 Tufts-B** Loss 4-12 447.6 Ignored Apr 13th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
361 MIT-B Loss 6-8 84.53 Apr 13th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)