#55 Grand Canyon (11-1)

avg: 1216.94  •  sd: 101.61  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
183 Cal Poly-SLO-C** Win 13-4 474.73 Ignored Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
176 California-San Diego-B** Win 13-2 669.66 Ignored Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
152 UCLA-B Win 13-7 959.15 Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
121 California-Davis Win 13-6 1283.93 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
70 Southern California Win 13-5 1721.25 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
42 Stanford Loss 3-13 775.63 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
117 Arizona State Win 11-6 1260.26 Feb 15th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
94 California-Irvine Win 9-7 1210.39 Feb 15th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
102 San Jose State Win 12-7 1384.35 Feb 15th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
157 Loyola Marymount** Win 13-4 956.37 Ignored Feb 15th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
70 Southern California Win 12-11 1246.25 Feb 16th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
90 San Diego State Win 8-7 1084.3 Feb 16th Vice Presidents Day Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)