#46 Stanford (23-21)

avg: 1741.55  •  sd: 35.96  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
12 California Loss 7-12 1557.24 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
42 Colorado State Win 11-10 1891.65 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
24 Victoria Loss 8-9 1825.02 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
25 Utah Valley Loss 7-10 1554.34 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
94 Cal Poly-CCWR Win 13-12 1599.67 Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
281 California-B** Win 13-4 1361.82 Ignored Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
175 California-Davis Win 13-7 1720.18 Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
120 Cal Poly-SLO-B Win 11-9 1597.27 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
65 Grand Canyon Win 13-3 2224.33 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
131 Santa Clara Win 13-5 1922.07 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
4 Colorado Loss 6-13 1737.87 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
54 UCLA Win 11-7 2150.39 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
10 Washington Loss 8-12 1665.94 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
6 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 7-13 1679.38 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
41 California-San Diego Win 11-10 1897.27 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
9 Oregon State Loss 7-13 1558.93 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
42 Colorado State Win 13-9 2185.21 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
27 Utah Loss 8-11 1537.85 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
16 British Columbia Loss 9-12 1684.86 Mar 8th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
32 California-Santa Barbara Win 13-12 1961.17 Mar 8th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
122 Northwestern Win 13-8 1840.94 Mar 8th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
131 Santa Clara Win 13-6 1922.07 Mar 8th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
41 California-San Diego Loss 10-11 1647.27 Mar 9th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
8 California-Santa Cruz Loss 6-13 1550.25 Mar 9th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
45 Virginia Tech Win 9-7 2031.91 Mar 9th Stanford Invite 2025 Mens
49 Chicago Loss 6-8 1428.83 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
15 Davenport Loss 6-14 1441.09 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
56 Indiana Win 14-11 1972.68 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
76 Ohio State Win 13-6 2170.01 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
49 Chicago Loss 8-10 1466.66 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
42 Colorado State Win 9-8 1891.65 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
15 Davenport Loss 6-13 1441.09 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
202 Cal Poly-Humboldt Win 12-8 1488.17 Apr 12th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
175 California-Davis Win 14-7 1745.53 Apr 12th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
8 California-Santa Cruz Loss 7-13 1592.72 Apr 12th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
12 California Loss 12-14 1856.8 Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
12 California Loss 10-15 1624.15 Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
131 Santa Clara Win 15-7 1922.07 Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
121 Arizona State Win 15-7 1947.3 Apr 26th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
12 California Loss 7-15 1477.75 Apr 26th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
32 California-Santa Barbara Loss 9-13 1417.61 Apr 26th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
85 Southern California Win 15-14 1624.33 Apr 26th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
65 Grand Canyon Win 15-5 2224.33 Apr 27th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
54 UCLA Loss 12-13 1558.5 Apr 27th Southwest D I College Mens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)