#203 Tennessee-Chattanooga (7-16)

avg: 395.01  •  sd: 70.04  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
83 Clemson** Loss 1-13 563.67 Ignored Mar 8th The Only Tenn I See 2025
81 Tennessee** Loss 2-12 596.93 Ignored Mar 8th The Only Tenn I See 2025
83 Clemson Loss 7-12 643.16 Mar 9th The Only Tenn I See 2025
81 Tennessee** Loss 1-13 596.93 Ignored Mar 9th The Only Tenn I See 2025
209 Vanderbilt Win 9-8 405.82 Mar 22nd Moxie Madness 2025
71 Union (Tennessee)** Loss 2-10 670.35 Ignored Mar 22nd Moxie Madness 2025
154 Xavier Loss 5-11 77.47 Mar 22nd Moxie Madness 2025
163 Alabama Loss 1-8 40.88 Mar 23rd Moxie Madness 2025
233 Auburn Win 9-5 653.82 Mar 23rd Moxie Madness 2025
155 Berry Loss 5-10 103.53 Mar 23rd Moxie Madness 2025
99 Emory** Loss 3-8 475.33 Ignored Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
29 Georgia** Loss 0-15 1126.12 Ignored Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
212 Georgia-B Win 10-7 662.28 Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
81 Tennessee** Loss 5-15 596.93 Ignored Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
99 Emory** Loss 3-11 475.33 Ignored Apr 13th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
258 Emory-B** Win 15-1 286.02 Ignored Apr 13th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
156 Georgia Southern Loss 6-15 73.6 Apr 13th Southern Appalachian D I Womens Conferences 2025
172 Florida State Win 10-9 724.77 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
29 Georgia** Loss 1-15 1126.12 Ignored Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
169 Miami (Florida) Loss 2-14 9.04 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
209 Vanderbilt Win 12-5 880.82 Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
156 Georgia Southern Loss 2-15 73.6 Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
209 Vanderbilt Win 11-8 646.43 Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)