#10 Washington (7-4)

avg: 2344.56  •  sd: 69.83  •  top 16/20: 100%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
1 British Columbia Loss 7-13 2343.68 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
13 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 10-11 2145.8 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
9 California-Santa Cruz Win 13-11 2574.11 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
23 UCLA Win 7-6 2084.3 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
37 California Win 13-10 2080.5 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
8 California-San Diego Loss 9-12 2011.21 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
29 Pittsburgh Win 12-6 2384.16 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
23 UCLA Win 13-5 2559.3 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
8 California-San Diego Win 11-9 2605.78 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
18 Northeastern Win 10-5 2696.67 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
6 Stanford Loss 8-9 2248.21 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)