#17 California-Davis (9-11)

avg: 2155.33  •  sd: 50.81  •  top 16/20: 98.4%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
14 Brigham Young Loss 6-7 2085.64 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
1 British Columbia** Loss 5-13 2301.21 Ignored Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
9 California-Santa Cruz Loss 9-10 2220.27 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
22 Pennsylvania Loss 6-7 1839.07 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
19 Victoria Win 6-5 2203.42 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
12 Utah Loss 7-11 1863.89 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
35 Colorado State Win 13-3 2359.29 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
8 California-San Diego Loss 6-9 1938.01 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
15 California-Santa Barbara Win 12-9 2506.69 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
9 California-Santa Cruz Loss 9-11 2096.06 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
44 Southern California Win 13-2 2303.39 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
1 British Columbia** Loss 4-13 2301.21 Ignored Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
12 Utah Loss 8-13 1834.62 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
19 Victoria Win 9-7 2357.75 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
13 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 7-8 2145.8 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
18 Northeastern Loss 9-11 1873.56 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
53 Santa Clara Win 12-3 2186.14 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
9 California-Santa Cruz Win 12-11 2470.27 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
34 Wisconsin Win 8-7 1891.57 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
23 UCLA Win 8-3 2559.3 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)