#49 Colorado State (3-8)

avg: 1324.07  •  sd: 76.43  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
4 Brigham Young Loss 5-13 1303.19 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
23 Utah Loss 8-12 1132.96 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
42 Stanford Loss 10-11 1250.63 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
48 California-Santa Barbara Win 4-3 1450.4 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
11 California Loss 8-12 1321.62 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
13 Oregon State Loss 9-13 1313.46 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
11 California Loss 6-13 1162.78 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
12 Colorado Loss 9-12 1393.75 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
33 Victoria Win 12-6 2018.36 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
42 Stanford Loss 9-13 957.06 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
62 UCLA Win 10-9 1295.49 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)